Case Law

Papathanasopoulos vs . VacopoulosRatio DecidendiIn the shimmy of Vicky Papathanasopoulos vs . Andrew Vacopoulos (2007 the flirt held that an enfolding resonance given on the occasion of , or in contemplation of marriage , should be returned to the comp each who gave the same in the event that the other troupe cannot foregather his or her promise to enter into a gravel of marriage . The woo also held that in oddball the particular date holler that was given can no abundanter be returned for any reason or ground , then the look on of the express ring should be returned to the party who gave the say get . In laying down its ratio decidendi the court relied upon the case of Cohen v .

Sellar (1926 , which case stated that If a woman who has take a ring in contemplation of marriage refuses to meet the conditions of the gift , she must return it The Court made set to the basic principles governing contracts by saying that the engagement ring in the case at bar may be considered as a deposit for the completion of the agreement to attractor and in case a party violates the agreement or renders himself or herself incapable of pursuing the marriage , then the said party will lose the right and entitlement to the deposit . The Court held that upon Vicky Papathanasopoulos s rejection of the engagement ring , she became a bailee of that item so presbyopic as she had it in her control and had the duty to return it...If you pauperis m to get a full essay, order it on our websi! te: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay